Pretty much every teenage boy will, at some point, indulge
in reading fantasy novels, or comics, or participating in role playing games,
or become over-excited by films based on any of the above. There is something about a realm filled with
smelly, grunting orcs and elegantly refined elves which speaks to the pubescent
male psyche. For my own sake, I read
Tolkien one summer holiday round about thirteen and then put it to one
side. Still, though, I came back for
more, I felt the grizzly pull of dwarfs clanging tankards. Where Tolkien felt like a drudge, I whizzed
through Terry Pratchett’s novels, but then those were both fantasy and not
fantasy.
I was greatly saddened to read of Pratchett’s death last week. His Discworld novels were an
important part of my teenage reading and were partly the inspiration for the
dreadful fantasy novel of my own, which I wrote aged fifteen. My book poached many of the scaffholding
concepts Pratchett used for his deliciously realised universe - a strange realm reflecting, like a cracked
mirror, our own, provided you were on acid when you looked in it - only I
managed to do it with a significant lack of humour. Still, at some one hundred and fifty closely
typed pages it was, at least, a novel of sorts.
The first part of a trilogy, obviously, for all fantasy novels have to
form part of a larger tapestry. Even
this Pratchett managed to better than most with his Discworld series comprising
some forty odd novels.
But of course Pratchett only used fantasy as window
dressing. They are really satires of the
modern condition and the human frailty; monumentally funny, at times bordering
on the simply silly, but delightfully so. They are propelled along by an acute sense of
drama, dialogue and the core stages of a novel.
To an extent, they were formulaic but wonderfully executed none the less.
Anyone wanting to understand how to
structure a novel – and to enjoy a few hours of blissful mirth – could do no
worse than read a Terry Pratchett book.
Meanwhile, our current Lords and Ladies, led by an Eton educated
variation of the Patrician with Granny Weatherwax in the Home Office and theLibrarian in the Treasury are happily self-satirising themselves in an endless
spiral to oblivion. In 2010 the
Conservatives campaigned on the slogan of vote blue, get green. The stressing of their environmental
credentials was crucial to helping sway portions of the middle ground, swing
voters concerned about the impending environmental catastrophe.
In the five year run up, from Cameron’s ascendency as leader
of her Majesty’s Opposition to the last election, he positioned himself as the
champion of the environment. His much
covered trip to see the melting of the ice caps and hug a husky, which probably
overall caused more harm than good as trips to the Arctic are hardly carbon
neutral, attempted to show his caring and sensitive side. All that’s gone by the wayside now, little
more than a barely remembered fantasy.
Or a satire on how to present politicians as electable. We’ve gone round in circles so many times
now, I’m no longer sure which it is.
Admittedly the realities of government were always going to
bite into a party’s ideals. Just look
across the Atlantic for the disappointments of Obama, who turned out, after
all, to not be the messiah but a politician forced into compromise like
everyone before him. So any ecological
aspirations were always going to be tempered by legal issues, big business
pressures, pandering to backbenchers in marginal seats, but still it is hard
not to be surprised at how utterly toothless the promise to be the greenest
government ever has ended up.
The Green Bank which could have been such a force for good,
has been totally handcuffed by Austerity Osborne. It is unable to act like any other financial
institution, not even permitted to borrow money to generate revenue to invest
and supplement the paltry budget gifted to it by the Treasury. So rather than pump-priming new businesses
and giving initiatives that could be a real force for change the investment
they need, it shuffles around the halls of power offering snippets of advice, a
reassuring clap on the shoulder but no actual, real cash. It’s a pointless waste of space other than to
allow the coalition to say it met its election promise in spirit if not in any
meaningfulness.
Instead we get exasperations of let’s “get rid of this green crap”. In other words, fuck the planet,
screw the promises we made to the electorate, let’s just make life easier in
the short term. Governing shouldn’t be
about making easy decisions in the face of adversity. It should be about identifying the right,
honourable and best path to everyone’s future and leading us there, despite the
braying hysteria of climate change deniers.
We’ve had a government that tried to sell off the national
forests, because of course nothing could ever go wrong in selling a commodity
like land the economic potential of which wasn’t being reached. The buyers were being asked, like those who
took over the Post Office, to give a gentleman’s agreement that they would
maintain them as they are. What could
have possibly gone wrong?
We’ve had a government which has permitted the introduction
of fracking for shale gas, despite the data coming out of the significantly
less densely populated regions of the United States suggesting serious
environmental subsidence as a result. Don’t
worry, the whole island might just sink.
And even it doesn’t, as Lord Howell pointed out, there’s nothing in the
desolate North East to be affected.
Aside from, y’know, Newcastle, Sunderland, Peter Lee, Middlesbrough,
Durham and countless other towns. Oh,
no, he meant the North West. That’s okay,
then. The residents of Manchester and
Liverpool will be fine with the earthquakes.
A few tidal waves will liven up the jewel in the natural beauty crown,
the Lake District. Fucking idiot.
At times it has seemed as though the only person in
parliament to recognise how insane this is, is Caroline Lucas. The UK’s solitary Green MP had the courage of
her convictions to the point of being arrested protesting against fracking in
Surrey.
Lucas has a banner in her office which reads “Well behaved
women rarely make history.” I’m reminded
of a Pratchett quote: “Something is only
worth doing if someone, somewhere would rather you didn’t.”
‘I think I love Caroline Lucas,’ my fully paid up Labour
party member wife said the other weekend over breakfast, a dreamy glaze coming
over her face. ‘No, I mean really love
her.’ That’s what real leadership
inspires. That’s what it means to take
the difficult decisions, Dave.
Rather than sort out – ie renationalise – the existing rail
service, this government has embarked on the biggest programme of road building
in decades. We do get HS2, a London
centric service which obliterates a stretch of the countryside hitherto
relatively unblemished by industrialisation, but refreshing and rejuvenating
the existing rail network should have been the way forward. To encourage rail travel – and therefore not
car travel – we need a system of reliable, cost-effective trains. It should not cost two adults going to Devon
by train triple what it would in my eleven year old Honda Civic.
The only fully functioning, profit making rail service in
the country is the East Coast Mainline which was state run after a bungled
attempt to retender the contract, caused by Civil Service lay-offs. Except now it isn’t; the tender has been
redone – at great expense reminding us that people employed generally do have
things to do (even if you disagree with what those are) - with proper
governance and regular users can look forward to a rapid decline in service any
week now.
Similarly, the row over airport expansion is framed in a
distinctly non-environmentally friendly fashion. The dispute is predominately over whether to
expand Heathrow or somewhere else (Manchester promoting greater diversity,
Boris’ ego rubbing island out in the Thames estuary, Gatwick or Stanstead on
the flimsy evidence that less homes would be under the flypath) but nowhere do
we seriously question whether the extra capacity is needed. Anyone who suggests as such is labelled
anti-business, willing to surrender our status as a hub to Frankfurt or
Amsterdam.
Of course, as I write this I can see a steady chain of
planes entering the Heathrow queue over Oxleas’ wood, banking at Lewisham and
heading right over Hilly Fields where we got married and, before then, our
house. At their current height, some
twenty miles out, it is not the noise levels which is problematic but the
persistency of their passing. One every
fifteen seconds or so creates a continual low drone. I barely notice the noise, but it drives my
wife mad and what cannot be disputed is the volume already fills the sky. So we have a vested interest in less not more
traffic through Heathrow – or, even better, varied flight paths which share the
pain around the city.
With one hand we’re continually told that business is
modernising; that it is all Skype calls and cloud computing. That physical infrastructures are
increasingly unnecessary and yet we must build another runaway to accommodate
more and more expensive, international business travel. t makes as much sense as Jeremy Clarkson’s
continuing employment with the BBC.
At my parents’ house last weekend I found a blue ring-binder
with The Seventh Son scrawled in black marker on it. My first pseudo-Pratchett novel. I’d been thinking about it during the week, but
hadn’t expected to stumble across a copy. I opened the folder to find reams of black paper.
The old dot matrix print had faded over the
intervening years leaving just the faintest intent to suggest that something had
once been there.
This lasting impression is the sort generated by Cameron’s
choice of Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Caroline Spelman was so effective a minister
that her Wikipedia entry doesn’t even mention the highest office that she
held. Owen Patterson is a climate change
sceptic who refused to accept a scientific briefing while in post.
UKIP MEP for Scotland David Martin called climate change and
environmental efficiency a “middle class obsession” on Radio 4’s Any Questions. He appears to suggest that a preoccupation
with planetary survival bears no relation on the lives of ordinary people, as
though we all don’t have children and grandchildren whom we might like to live. To not act is to betray our children.
In 1931 Ramsey Macdonald was seen as a traitor to the Labour
Party. The man who had led the first
party to its first government, the first Labour Prime Minister, was vilified
for becoming PM again. He did so as the
head of a National Unity Government. The
majority of the three parties went to the electorate and said the country was
facing an emergency. The rolling
shockwaves of the Great Depression were continuing to cause instability and
strife across the world and extremist groups to the furthest right and left
wings of the political spectrum were making merry havoc in the ruined
wake. This was not, Macdonald declared,
a time for playing party politics. This
was a time for unified, concentrated national action.
Not everyone in the three main parties agreed. David Lloyd-George and his massive ego were
still hanging around and led a smattering of Liberals against the national
party. The Labour Party saw Macdonald’s actions
as pandering to big business and the established class structures, of
abandoning the working man to his doom.
The National Government won the election by a phenomenal
landslide and despite the predominately Tory make-up of the party, Macdonald returned
to Downing Street. If we want to save
the planet, this is what we need again.
A national – and international – concentration of leadership. A unifying presence which doesn’t bicker over
the detail but which focuses on making systematic structural changes which will
reduce carbon emissions and build a sustainable future for us all. Climate change isn’t going to be saved by the
small number of businesses willing to stick their neck out to be potentially
punished by their share holders. It
doesn’t make a difference, in the end, whether individuals put their rubbish in
different colour coded bins and cycle to Norfolk for their holidays. What we need is fundamental change and
legislation. The state needs to lead the
way and force, if necessary, people and business to follow suit. Everything else is like believing in magic,
it’s charming, but it isn’t real.
Most of Terry Pratchett’s best lines were given to the
skeletal personification of DEATH who crops up in many of his novels. In Good Omens it says DON’T THINK OF IT AS
DYING. THINK OF IT AS LEAVING EARLY TO
BEAT THE RUSH. I’d rather we all were
able to hang around and enjoy the view a bit longer, thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment